Saturday, October 29, 2016

Bette and Joan's Acting Duel: 'What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?'


A rare color shot of 'What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?' B&W signified drama. 
Can you imagine 'Pyscho,' 'Manchurian Candidate,' or 'Virginia Woolf' in color?


What more can be said about What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? Well, here’s my two cents. The 1962 film classic has been loved and loathed, quoted and parodied, badly remade for TV and periodically threatened with a big-screen remake starring God knows who. Don’t bother, Hollywood! Baby Jane’s original stars, Bette Davis and Joan Crawford, are the kind of movie lightning that doesn’t strike twice.
Davis & Crawford on the set of 'Baby Jane.' All smiles here.
Like Psycho, which came out two years prior, Baby Jane was a bleak, black-and-white flick shot on a low budget with big stars, and upturning plot conventions that threw audiences for a loop. What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? gave the careers of Bette Davis and Joan Crawford a new lease on life.
It’s also movie legend that Bette and Joan absolutely loathed one another. I believe the rivalry/jealousy/disdain between these dueling divas is what gives Baby Jane its incredible tension. Just as their real-life marital tensions ignites Richard Burton and Liz Taylor’s George and Martha in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Davis and Crawford’s animosity is most apparent. On its own, Baby Jane is a top-notch, well-crafted suspense thriller, with a terrific supporting cast. However, it’s the two Hollywood legends, as twisted sisters in sibling rivalry, who take this film into another realm. Their rivalry turned into a grudge match two years later when they tried to re-team in Hush...Hush, Sweet Charlotte. But that’s another showbiz story!
Baby Jane Hudson was the star of the family--at first!
For the uninitiated, What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? is the gothic showbiz saga of sisters Jane and Blanche Hudson, played by Davis and Crawford, respectively. Jane is the vaudeville child star and breadwinner of the Hudson family. Flash forward to the 1930s and now Blanche is a big, fat movie star and Jane is a no-talent lush. Coming home from a party one night, there is a car accident—“incident” would be more accurate—leaving Blanche crippled.
No, Joan isn't re-writing her will! Blanche sees Jane's cursive.
A quarter of a century later brings Baby Jane to the present. Blanche is still in that wheelchair and Jane is now not only a drunk, but deranged to boot.  And when Jane gets a whiff of Blanche’s plan to downsize, which includes putting Jane away, she puts the boots to Blanche, figuratively and literally.
Baby Jane is a cat-and-mouse suspense film of the highest order. The plot plays off the real stars’ careers. For the scene of a director moaning over Jane’s latest bad film, clips of Bette’s actual early acting efforts were shown. Watch Joan as Blanche gaze in rapture while watching one of Joan’s real ‘30s reel hits. Or the scene where Jane tries to order a bunch of booze from the liquor store, then impersonates Blanche to clear the order. It is obvious Joan’s voice was dubbed in, but one wonders how director Aldrich got Joan to lay on her cultivated MGM English thicker than Bette’s Baby Jane makeup. Watch Bette, then at a career low, as Jane, asking strangers if they remember who she is! Actual portraits and photos of Bette and Joan’s career litter the Hudson mansion as props.  
Jane works her Blanche Hudson imitation to her advantage throughout 'Baby Jane.'

The dialogue in Baby Jane has some of the most famous one-liners in film history—do I really need to repeat them? The one-liners that allude to Bette and Joan’s real life feelings for one another are especially entertaining. At the very end of Baby Jane, after two hours of sisterly warfare, Bette’s Jane plaintively says to Joan’s Blanche: “You mean all this time we could have been friends?”
Davis & Crawford rehearse for the beach finale of 'What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?'

All of this is all just delicious frosting on a cinema cake. What makes What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? memorable are the performances of Bette Davis and Joan Crawford. Film fans love to argue about who was the greater actress, but in this instance, Davis and Crawford were both great in polar opposite roles. Joan had less obvious mannerisms than Bette; still, Crawford tones down the latter day dramatics that beefed up some her ‘50s vehicles, and made them camp classics. As wheelchair-bound Blanche, Joan underplays and wins our sympathy, watching her old movies on TV, grateful for a new generation of fans that they’re generating. As the tension between the two sisters amps up, while we’re still rooting for Joan/Blanche, but start noticing Joan’s insinuating threats, coated with grand insincerity. Joan’s last vestiges of on-screen glamour slowly get stripped away as she is mentally and physically tortured by her character’s crazed sister. This was brave of Crawford, the eternal glamour star. The last scene, on the beach, with dying Blanche finally telling the truth to Jane, is beautifully performed by both Joan and Bette.
Davis slyly took out a classified ad for acting work before 'Baby Jane.'
As for Bette Davis, her turn as Baby Jane Hudson was as huge a comeback. Only two years before, Bette had jokingly put a classified ad seeking acting work in the Hollywood trades. Still, some critics and moviegoers rolled their eyes at what they thought was Bette Davis at her most over the top as Jane. To me, Bette went for broke as Baby Jane—and won. Bette is terrifying at times, but also funny, sad, dramatic, and finally, child-like. Davis hits all these notes in her best scene, when Jane is alone, drinking. She hears her childhood hit, “I’ve Written a Letter to Daddy,” in her head. With no one but her Baby Jane Hudson doll as company, Jane sings along in her raspy voice. Putting the doll’s bow up to her head, Jane walks to the mirror, singing coyly. Seeing her now-ravaged self, Bette lets out a pathetic moan as Jane. Upstairs, Blanche starts laying on the buzzer like a game show contestant, Jane slowly lifts her head and launches into a bellowing tirade, starting with, “Whaddya want, Blanche?!” Bette knocks this virtuoso scene out of the park.
IMO, Bette Davis' most brilliant scene as 'Baby Jane.'
For What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?, Davis received her 10th and last Oscar nomination. Davis had some tough competition at the Oscars that year—Anne Bancroft in The Miracle Worker, Kate Hepburn in Long Day’s Journey into Night, Geraldine Page in Sweet Bird of Youth, and Lee Remick in The Days of Wine and Roses.
I think Bette should have taken her 3rd Oscar home for What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? Maybe my criteria are not the benchmark of great acting, but of the five performances, Bette’s the one that people remember best and still talk about. Davis took some big risks and they paid off. And Joan should have been nominated for at least best supporting actress as Blanche. Crawford truly supports Davis, supplying sympathy and reality, her Blanche underplaying to Davis’ Jane’s baroque descent into madness.

The beach scene finale; Davis and Crawford are both brilliant
.
In the end, awards mean nothing. Hardly anybody remembers who won an Oscar for what movie. But everybody who has seen this frightening film will never forget Bette Davis and Joan Crawford in What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?
"You mean all this time we could have been friends?"

FYI: I put all the movie overflow on my public FB  movie page. 

Check it out & join!  https://www.facebook.com/groups/178488909366865/


19 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. One Of The Best Film Of My Youth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well put and well written. A lot of reviews make fun of this film as campy but you see this film and review it as exactly how I saw it - a terrific film with two screen legends giving a knock out performance. I love this film for its story two 1940 movie stars that brings us to the present where they are old and long forgotten. It's almost sad to watch because it shows the golden years long gone. Bette Davis and Joan Crawford - WOW! How can people mock this movie?? Bette Davis shows us again why she became such a legend. She played that part so perfectly and kudos to her for donning all that hideous makeup to play it. It was always my favorite movie of hers. This was an actress. Getting Joan Crawford to play the sister and together they are magic. Another pro who can show actresses how it's done. Yes, it was a tough competition year in the Oscar race in which Joan didn't even get a nod and Bette lost out for the triple crown. You phrased it perfectly - awards mean nothing and ask me who won last year and my mind goes blank. All that remains are the stellar performances two great actresses gave.

      Delete
    2. Hi there, just saw this. Yes, I find knee jerk reactions to certain films and stars quite tiresome. Especially in the age of the internet, where everybody parrots each other. 'Baby Jane' is gripping every time I watch it, and I've seen it a zillion times! As I wrote, Bette was NEVER afraid to go there, and she hits all the bases as Jane. And Joan should have asked to be put in Best Supporting Actress category that year (unheard of then) because she truly gives a terrific supporting performance. Imagine if they had both won that year... wow! But there was a contingent, and still there, that feels the movie was a stunt. Their loss, I say. Cheers, Rick

      Delete
  3. It's the only time I thought Crawford gave a fine performance, so, she was a great professional here. Davis is supreme, BUT----- it's expected of her. That's BETTE DAVIS after all.
    So, they could really work together.
    The TV REDGRAVE was not in the same league, though I did like LYNN.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think Crawford could be good, but she was not versatile, Bette was. For those who try to equate Joan as an actress with Bette, imagine them swapping parts in 'Baby Jane.' Bette could have played Blanche, but Joan as Baby Jane? Never in a million years.

      As for the Redgrave sisters, great actresses both. But when I saw this most needless remake on TV, I was amazed at the lack of tension. And filming it like a kitchen sink drama, with no style. It was a total bust, in my book.

      Cheers, Rick

      Delete
  4. It's become like an urban myth that Davis got the part of Jane after placing the available for work ad but in fact the advert was placed nine days after What Ever Happened To Baby Jane finished production.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right? And it wasn't like Bette hadn't been working: touring with Gary Merrill with the Carl Sandburg production, A Pocketful of Miracles, and Night of the Iguana. Davis was making a general, pointed point about the lack of roles for actresses, especially older ones.
      Thanks for writing!
      Rick

      Delete
  5. Yes, Bette Davis is a much better actress with much more range than Joan.
    Still Crawford made some very good pictures, especially when she let her vulnerability show like in Baby Jane.
    Other favorites include Mildred Pierce (of course), A Woman's Face, the second of her films titled Possessed (1947) and the overlooked but incredible Autumn Leaves, another Aldrich film featuring newcomer Cliff Robertson.

    ReplyDelete
  6. i too think davis ought to have won the oscar for this unforgettable performance.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think the' 62 Oscar race was the all-time best list. Frankly any performance could've taken it. I think this was Hepburn's best work (and that is really saying something)Remick was absolutely heartbreaking ,Page was mesmerizing as the fading movie queen and even won a Golden Gobe(Dramatic).The NY Times was on strike so there was no film critic's award, although The National Board of Review backed Bancroft and poor Roz Russell didn't even make the cut for Gypsy although she got a Globe for Best Mus-Comedy .Oddly the Globes listed ten nominees in the Dramatic Actress category but Crawford's name was not among them.( a true slap in the face). I don't think Joan would've accepted a Supporting nod if it was offered .I read somewhere the studio was pushing for a nomination for The Best of Everything but ever the star Crawford balked and nothing came of it .I think she thought like many of the Golden Age Stars that leading rolls would just stop coming.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The '62 Oscar noms were pretty strong in all the acting categories. Yes, every Best Actress nom was a key role in each actress' career. And the Supporting Actress category was tough, too. Personally, I think Patty Duke should have been given a special Oscar as a juvenile. And letting Joan get nominated for Baby Jane (tho she wouldn't have gone for it!) and letting Angela Lansbury win for her stunning monster mommie in "Manchurian Candidate." Great comments, BTW. Cheers, Rick

      Delete
  8. Can we discuss the vulgar subject of money? With their percentage deals, how much did Davis and Crawford earn from "Baby Jane's" success?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems like one took more money and less percentage... Bette, I think. Frankly, neither walked away with the money they should have, since they sold the movie!

      Delete
    2. About their "salaries" for Baby Jane, I've read that because they each had a percentage of the profits; each received a million or more.

      Delete
  9. Thee winner that year won for a role she did on Bdway for over 2 yrs. No stretch there

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would have been happy to see Bette win. Also, of the five performances, it's the one that's still talked about the most!

      Delete
  10. Joan and Bette were co-leads, Joan is NOT supporting.

    ReplyDelete