"The Rains of Ranchipur." Charismatic Richard Burton & femme fatale Lana Turner give each other the eye while her husband Michael Rennie seems oblivious... This scenario seems familiar! |
Burton would replay this scenario for real in 1962! |
What happens when you mix soap suds with man-made or mother
nature’s calamities? The result is Hollywood “disaster” movies, always a movie
staple. The genre hit their peak in the 1970s when Irwin Allen set up beloved stars
in the most basic scenarios, only to be knocked down like bowling pins.
The Rains of Ranchipur is a ‘50s example, with stars who
suffer emotional and physical turmoil. A rich couple travel to India to buy a
race horse. The wife is wealthy and does as she pleases, while the husband
suffers stoically, and spends her money. At their host’s party, one look at an
Indian doctor and the wife gets a fever! Theirs and some supporting characters’
plots plod along until the titled torrents wash some sense right into their
brains. If this had been an Irwin Allen flick, a few of the supporting cast
would have washed away. While not setting the silver screen ablaze, Lana
Turner, Richard Burton, and Fred MacMurray do well enough in their roles in The Rains of Ranchipur. Lana gives an old-style
movie star performance, Richard surprisingly underplays, and Fred offers up a
veteran star going through his paces.
Michael Rennie's Lord looks on as Lady Lana Turner greets old pal Fred MacMurray. Eugenie Leontovich looks skeptical as the Maharani in "The Rains of Ranchipur." |
While The Rains of
Ranchipur has been compared unfavorably to the 1939 version, The Rains Came, the former is no great
shakes, either. Both are escapist entertainment done adequately. The original
has Myrna Loy, Tyrone Power, and George Brent, at the height of their
freshness. And new star Power at least looked
exotic as the Indian doctor. The ’39 version made nearly three times as much at
the box office as the ’55 version; the latter was only a moderate hit.
Cool poster for a lukewarm movie, 1955's "The Rains of Ranchipur." |
There have been quotes attributed to Richard Burton
regarding Lana Turner's acting abilities. Well, Turner wasn't Davis or
Stanwyck, but she knew how to give a movie star performance when faced with
lesser material. So did Joan Crawford and later, Elizabeth Taylor—it must have
been in the MGM Handbook! Turner's rich playgirl is pure dime store romance,
but she plays the stereotype quite entertainingly. Lana Turner was 34 here. Though
Lana’s prematurely past her youthful freshness, it's still nice to see her
glamour before it became shellacked in Imitation
of Life.
Mid-stardom, Lana Turner is presented ravishingly, 1955's "The Rains of Ranchipur." |
Yet in all the promo pics, Lana Turner looks ghostly! |
As for Burton, he admitted over the years that he was not
the best physical actor and relied much on his great voice. Fair enough. Still,
he looks like a soldier standing at attention; sitting, he slumps in a not very
leading man-like posture. Of course, the world's most famous Welshman looks
absurd in a turban and brown face as Dr. Safti. Yet, Richard is striking to
look at in his handsome youth, with blue-green eyes even more piercing with the
makeup. It's been noted that as brown-faced Burton has more scenes with golden
Lana, his skin tones become lighter. Love is strange, as the song goes! Richard
doesn't over-act, as he could later do, but he is very minimal, which might be
the right way to play this role, when so unconvincingly cast as another
nationality.
Richard Burton's brilliant Hindu doctor also has brilliant blue-green eyes! |
Michael Rennie has the unenviable role as cuckold husband Albert
to Turner’s adventuress wife. Rennie’s
stone face made him perfect as the visitor from outer space, but playing
opposite one of the flashiest stars in MGM’s galaxy is a thankless task.
Fred MacMurray as Tom Ransome, a brilliant man who drinks too much in "The Rains of Ranchipur." Fred's expression reminds me of Benedict Cumberbatch here. |
Fred MacMurray, as Lana's long-time friend Tom Ransome, is
the rich drinking man. Fred's solid, but still on the stodgy side, and a bit on
autopilot. His love interest is Joan Caulfield as Fern, who is supposed to be
college age, while Fred was in his mid-40s. Joan was actually 33, a year
younger than woman of the world Lana! Caulfield aims to go beyond the typical
second lead ingénue role and is slightly overbearing. Here, Joan’s perky interactions
with world-weary Fred are just a bit too precious.
Eugenie Leontovich has a field day as the willful Maharani, who spars with Lana Turner's playgirl over Richard Burton's brilliant doc, in "The Rains of Ranchipur." |
Russian actress Eugenie Leontovich, who plays Burton's mother-figure
as the Maharani, is another light-eyed Indian. And she has a field day
overplaying the Indian grande dame, which is saying something, since the role
was originally played by Maria Ouspenskaya. Movie fans may recall Leontovich as
the wheelchair-bound woman in William Castle’s cult classic, Homicidal.
The characters of "The Rains of Ranchipur" work together during the titled disaster. |
As for Lana, though her character has married Michael
Rennie's for the title, she's the money bags. So that explains how Lana is a
"Lady," but how the heck did a Lana end up playing a character named
"Edwina?!" I smiled every time she was addressed as "Lady
Edwina."
Lana's Lady Edwina is shocked when Doc Burton's mind wasn't on HER while tending to the survivors of "The Rains of Ranchipur." |
Aside from Burton's disparaging quotes about Lana, Turner
has protested perhaps a bit too much that she found Richard unappealing as a
man and star. Joan Collins would make the same claims shortly after, with The Sea Wife. As neither woman was
particularly discriminating when it came to men, I maintain a healthy skepticism
toward their stances. It's amusing that Burton and Turner, two of
Hollywood's biggest players, claimed to not get personal off the set. And it’s very amusing that Burton plays a
character that has been chaste!
Turner's Lady Edwina redeems herself in a final reel from "The Rains of Ranchipur." |
Fox's Travilla did not do Lana Turner’s wardrobe, and Lana
brought her MGM style crew with her to Fox, including designer Helen Rose. Perhaps
Travilla got his revenge on her later with the gaudy get ups of The Big Cube!
Jean Negulesco directs competently, if not with his usual sophisticated
style. The 1950s was flooded with studio remakes of their golden oldies, and The Rains
of Ranchipur was a by the numbers rehash. The location shooting was in
Pakistan, but did any of the stars actually go there?
The chemistry between Lana & Richard doesn't set the Cinemascope screen on fire, but they have their moments, in 1955's "The Rains of Ranchipur." |
The Rains of Ranchipur is a mildly entertaining movie for
some lazy time in your favorite chair, for movie stars and studio style.
After Lana Turner’s comeback in The Bad in the Beautiful, it was back to doing junk like The Rains of Ranchipur. Here’s one of
Turner’s best, my take here:
https://ricksrealreel.blogspot.com/2018/01/the-bad-and-beautiful-1952.html
My fave scene: after surviving illness & floods, Lana's first order of business is putting her makeup back on, in "The Rains of Ranchipur." |
I recently barely made it through The Rains Came (after years of trying) -- after reading your write-up, I think I'm going to give Ranchipur a pass. I sure enjoyed reading what you had to say though -- starting with that comparison picture with Burton and Taylor, it was great fun!
ReplyDeletePlease watch the film THE RAINS OF RANCHIPUR!!! I think that this critic is way too negative about the film because I enjoyed it immensely. !! I thought that Lana Turner was excellent as Lady Edwina and Richard Burton became the character of Dr Rama Safti! I like Michael Rennie in the film , too. It has some of the most beautiful color scenes that I have ever seen in a film. !! I would love to rewrite this review!! Please make up your own mind about seeing a film because I find critics ro be too critical and, hence, their name !!!
DeleteI loved the opening comparison photos...! Wild. I'm surprised that Lana's 100% drawn on eyebrows survived the flood...! Ha! But if I recall correctly, she only got rained on, not submerged in this one. Amazing that the "ingenue" was but one year younger in real life, too. I couldn't stand the way Joan wore her head scarf in this movie. Does that make me shallow? (Don't bother to answer.) Wrong as it may be, I find myself drawn to those 1950s actors with dark makeup on paired with their searing light eyes. It's such an alien look that it becomes strangely mesmerizing in color. Virtually every top actor played someone outside their own background at one time or another from Paul Newman to Burt Lancaster to Chuck Connors to Tony Curtis. The result was striking, as seen here with Richard.
ReplyDeleteYou always make me smile, Poseidon! And yes, coming from a generation of tanners, light eyes and dark skin are hot, to me! Not PC, I know, but hey! Cheers, Rick
DeleteI have been a fan of your blog for quite a while. This remake is a dull affair comparing with the original. It might have thrilled the audience in 1950's hunger for cinemaacope and stereophonic sound. However, the acting of Lana Turner, Richard Burton and Fred McMurray compare poorly to Loy. Power and Brent. Myrna Loy brouht such elegance and finesse to her characterization. Whereas Lana just did her stahdard movie star melodramatic posturing. Same goes for Richard Burton. Fred McMurray is tired and old whereas Brent gave a lot humor and dash to his characterization. Changes made from the original did not help. Letting Lana's character live was not a good idea.
ReplyDeleteThank you! And I've only seen clips of the '39 version, but even with that, it's obvious everyone involved was a lot fresher, and story more in keeping with the era. Your comments make me want to watch The Rains Came in its entirety now. Cheers, Rick
DeletePlease do, I think you will be surprised. I know the competition was tough in 1939 but Loy should have bern nominated for an Academy Award.
DeleteWill do. It was a huge hit in its day, also directed by Clarence Brown. Thx, Rick
DeleteMy choice is the 1939 version. The acting is better. The flood and earthquake scene is breathtaking. The special effects for 1939 are really impressive.
Delete