Monday, April 6, 2026

'Lucky Lady' & Other Cine-bombs of My '70s Youth

 

The most memorable thing about 1975's 'Lucky Lady'
starring Gene Hackman, Liza Minnelli, & Burt Reynolds
may be this beautiful Richard Amsel poster.

 

I discovered classic films during the early '70s, on TV afternoon movies. This coincided when Hollywood struck gold with modern cinematic gems that harkened to its studio era heyday: The Way We Were; The Sting; Chinatown; and That's Entertainment, to name the most notable.

Alas, there were an equal amount of much-hyped films that my '70s teen self couldn't wait to see, but which never made it to my local theater in Upper Michigan. And for good reason—most were flops!

One of the few film duds that did come to my hometown Manistique was 1974's The Great Gatsby. The 3rd version of F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel actually made money, but was a disappointment because of the enormous money spent making and promoting the lifeless movie. I was turned off because I already loved the book and couldn't imagine why anyone would pine after Mia Farrow for a decade. As for remote Robert Redford, he was not great as Gatsby. The supporting cast came off best in this fashion spread of a movie, which I never saw again.

My entertainment guru of the '70s was Rona Barrett, who really beat the
 drums for 1974's "The Great Gatsby." Note the Lucy headline at lower left!

I was also excited to see Lucille Ball as Mame in ’74. I watched all three of Lucy's series, which CBS was running: I Love Lucy and The Lucy Show in daytime reruns and Here's Lucy in prime time. The latest series should have been a warning. Canned comedy ensued whenever Lucy Carter met a celebrity and irritated them with her star struck antics or looked for an excuse to sing. On I Love Lucy, Ball's singing always caused intentional laughter. 

'Lucille Ball as Mame' was the hype mantra for this 1974 mammoth musical.

There were all kinds of promo for Mame. The gay geek that I was, I kept looking at the big spreads Rona Barrett's mags, marveling at how young Lucy looked. And there was the new fave, TV's Maude, Bea Arthur in a black Joan Crawford wig and ankle straps. I was awestruck —and so naive.

Love this headline for Rona Barrett's 1974 story on "Mame."
The short answer is NO!

Then the bad reviews for Mame came out… then there were stories about the reviews! I read one news story of Lucy at an event, dabbing tears away, distraught over the backlash. The news photo showed that she did not look young, despite Ball all dolled up like Mame. The film never shook the blues in my hometown! 

I saw Mame a couple times later on TV. My thought was that if the songs with Lucy's raspy singing were cut, Mame would have been much better. Only, then you would have Auntie Mame again. So why not just watch the 1958 Rosalind Russell as Mame Dennis?

Lucille Ball was a favorite veteran star for Rona Barrett magazines. 

Next, I was fascinated that my favorite star, Elizabeth Taylor, was heading an all-star musical remake of The Blue Bird, filmed in Russia. Directed by George Cukor, it was hyped as the ‘70s answer to The Wizard of Oz. I read gossip items on the troubled filming, but when I saw that Rona Barrett was promoting a big spread for the epic in her next issue, I was hopeful. Then the issue came out, and no sneak preview of Easter 1976’s The Blue Bird! I've only seen clips of the elusive epic on You Tube since and that was plenty. The Blue Bird looks like a chintzy costume party.

I was agog when I bought this People magazine with Elizabeth Taylor in
 costume in "The Blue Bird." I think I still have the Milton Greene cover shot.

A lovely poster for 1976's "The Blue Bird," a gawd-awful movie.

By 1976, I was becoming a jaded teen when it came to modern Hollywood cashing in on old-time Tinseltown. I loved the biography book, Gable and Lombard, which made me a new fan of Carole Lombard. When they cast Marcus Welby's James Brolin as Clark and newcomer Jill Clayburgh as Carole, I was appalled. When clips were previewed on TV talk shows, I knew once again that the onscreen Gable and Lombard was never coming to Upper Michigan. I finally watched Gable and Lombard during 2020's Covid lockdown, and found the film bio inaccurate at best, smutty and juvenile at worst.

I was hoping that 1976's "Gable and Lombard" wouldn't be as terrible
as it looked... sadly, it was!

And there was so much bad press about Barbra Streisand's ’76 remake of A Star is Born that I vowed not to go see it. In the '70s, people would flock to see Streisand sing from a phone book, so Star was a big hit. My female classmates loved it and when I sang the praises of Judy Garland's version over Babs', their sullen stares said, “Shut up, nerd!” I didn't see Streisand's Star until 2017, over 40 years later. It was indeed still awful, after all these years!

By the time 1976's "A Star is Born" came out, I never wanted to hear about this
 ego 
trip again. I finally watched Babs' version in 2017!

This brings me to 1975's Lucky Lady, which inspired all these movie memories. This was another event movie that I was all excited about back then: Cool Burt Reynolds! Judy Garland's daughter, Liza Minnelli! Gene Hackman, that guy from The Poseidon Adventure! And dreamboat Robby Benson, who sealed the deal! They were starring in a comedy caper like The Sting, which I loved. Once again, I pored over my bible, Rona Barrett’s magazines, trying to figure out what Lucky Lady was all about. Turns out, not much! The Christmas blockbuster was looked upon as a cinematic lump of coal and bad word of mouth trumped three superstars at the height of their appeal. This too didn't come to pass at my hometown's theater.

Just watched 1975's "Lucky Lady" for the 1st time in 2026! Better late than never?


I just saw a great copy of Lucky Lady for the first time on YouTube, in March 2026, over 50 years later. The disjointed story and style of Lucky Lady reflects its troubled filming. The plot of Lucky Lady was inspired by rum running stories on the western coast and classic buddy movies where the men fight over the sassy leading lady. What appeared onscreen was pretty thin, and no one knew how to end the movie. No one liked the original finale, where the men were killed, ala Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. One version that was quickly discarded had the trio reunited in their senior years and looking decomposed, not aged. 

The "old age" ending for 1975's "Lucky Lady" was quickly scrapped,
for good reason. The stars look mummified!

Stanley Donen, a classic era director fave of mine, was past his prime and out of his depth. As the romantic triangle, Gene Hackman fares well enough, displaying an early comic touch. Liza Minnelli, the leading lady, just wrote in her memoirs that Gene was extremely rude to her throughout filming. Hackman could be a curmudgeon, I think because he was rarely cast as a romantic leading man. Or perhaps it was because Gene was appalled by Liza's obnoxious performance as Claire. If you looked up "over the top," in the dictionary, I'm sure Liza's picture is on that page. And Liza goes beyond the pale in Lucky Lady. Minnelli is all over the place—character, comically, and she caterwauls her dialogue and two songs, both Kander and Ebb on autopilot. My guess is director Donen turned Liza loose, hoping the results would be triple threat Judy all over again. She looks like a deranged Clara Bow and whines and wheezes in her harried moments like Shelley Winters! Burt Reynolds is the surprise here. As the handsome but dim rum runner, Burt doesn't fall on his mock macho shtick and is quite endearing. Reynolds was a natural comic actor and could be a strong dramatic one, too. A shame Burt didn't prioritize those qualities over stardom.

Liza Minnelli, Gene Hackman, & Burt Reynolds take over the "Tonight Show"
 to promote 1975's "Lucky Lady." Everyone seems jovial here.

Gene Hackman, Liza Minnelli,  & Burt Reynolds may be wondering how
they got stuck in 1975's "Lucky Lady" he
re.

It must be said while Gene, Liza, and Burt were at the top of their ‘70s stardom, independent modern day stars weren't any better at choosing scripts than the old studio star system. All three made some real clinkers during this time: Gene in Zandy's Bride and Bite the Bullet; Liza in A Matter of Time and New York, New York; Burt in W.W. and the Dixie Dance Kings, At Long Last Love, and Nickelodeon. None of which I have seen, nor plan to, ever!

Of the superstar menage a trois with Burt, Liza, & Gene? I'd take only one!
 1975's "Lucky Lady."

As for Lucky Lady, what began with anticipation became a boondoggle, with a final film that satisfied no one. Visually, it's lovely despite the excessive soft focus, filmed along the water in Mexico. Some beautiful architecture serves as backdrops. Despite the incoherent story and unfunny dialogue, Gene, Burt, and Robby Benson, do decent work. But you have to be a hardcore Liza fan to enjoy her performance—she's one unlucky lady here. 

A sweet snapshot of the "Lucky Lady" cast: Robby Benson, Burt Reynolds,
 Liza Minnelli, & Gene Hackman.

Up next for Minnelli was New York, New York, which was another troubled production that flopped on first release. A few years later, a director's cut was released, to better effect. While Liza won praise for New York, New York, it's almost an anti-musical, not a tribute. To revamp a quip that Bette Midler made about another '70s song-laden movie disaster, "I never miss a Martin Scorsese musical.”

Well actually, I did. I don’t even recall if New York, New York came to Manistique—a Minnelli miss to be remedied at a later date!

Another big movie everyone was excited about... until it was released!
Rona Barrett gives the big build-up for 1977's "New York, New York."

My deep dish on Barbra Streisand's diva version of A Star is Born

https://ricksrealreel.blogspot.com/2017/08/barbra-streisands-star-is-born-still.html

 

 

 

 


11 comments:

  1. Those were all pretty bad. I saw Lucky Lady in the theater and it wasn’t terrible, it just wasn’t very good. I enjoyed the independent drive in style films back then-Death Race 2000, Torso, Suspira, a re-release double feature of Soldier Blue/Rider On The Rain. The only big names that consistently delivered entertaining films were Clint Eastwood and Charles Bronson. Female maybe Raquel Welch. Big star films usually didn’t appeal to me though I loved the disaster films like Earthquake and Towering Inferno. I do miss that era for many reasons now. It seems like such a sad world now even though I’m still having a blast lol.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, they were bad and there were many more, as the studios struggled to figure out what audiences wanted in mainstream movies. But there was certainly a variety back then! Do you remember drive-in movie from '75 called "Race with the Devil?" Scared the crap out of us kids! Glad you're still having a blast, Rick

      Delete
  2. Hi Rick! It’s Roberta. This post brought back such memories. The studios really put their “hype” machines into overdrive for all of these films. Boy do I remember the endless promotions in the movie mags of the day. The fawning star appearances on the Johnny Carson, Merv Griffin, and Mike Douglas shows. It was such a big deal when a yet-to-be released film scored a People magazine cover - in fact Mia Farrow as Daisy Buchanan was on the very first People cover!

    …and then the films were released. All the fanfare upfront meant a really big public beat down when the reviews came in. I think it’s a bit easier for “flop” films to disappear nowadays to some streamer. And the public seems a lot more wary about big publicity campaigns. But we were still gullible in the ‘70s - until we weren’t.

    Each of these films is a stinker despite a lot of talent involved in each. I think the 70s were a weird time for movies. Established stars of the classic era still thought they had box office clout; directors who rose to fame in the 50s were out of synch with “new Hollywood” standards; and the public’s tastes were in transition. It’s kind of funny that each of these films with the movie community “establishment “ behind them failed. In my mind the best example of a young hotshot director who knew how to tell a classic story with old school cinematic storytelling was when Steven Spielberg made Jaws. That film seemed to combine New Hollywood with the old “blockbuster” mentality and it worked fabulously. He even did it again with Raiders of the Lost Ark.

    A funny note - I cannot stand movies that are shot in that infernal soft focused diffused cinematography! Gatsby, Mame, Lucky Lady - ugh. It would have driven me crazy even if they were good movies. Even a very well done film like the 1970s version of Murder on the Orient Express suffers in my mind from that fuzzy focus.

    Thanks again for an entertaining essay.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Roberta, Thanks and totally agree! Love, Rick

      Delete
    2. I absolutely adored Rona Barrett's 1970s magazines, and I wasted too much of my meager salary on them. They were so good, chock full of great gossip and photos and articles.

      Delete
    3. Me, too! My Mom would get me subscriptions for Christmas! Cheers, Rick

      Delete
  3. loulou de la falaiseApril 9, 2026 at 10:58 AM

    I loved Liza's book, she did not pull any punches about her movie career going down the toilet. I never saw lucky lady and was surprised to see the picture of them all together on the tonight show. Troupers. I saw NY NY when it came out and didn't think it was a bad but movie, but man what a flat-out downer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I always thought Liza was one of those "big" personalities, like Merman, Stritch, etc., better suited to the stage than screen. Cheers, Rick

      Delete
  4. Watched Lucky Lady a couple of years ago on Tubi or Pluto.
    My takeaway was Burt's trousers did all the heavy lifting.
    And nice Amsel poster.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This subject matter (expensive movies that weren't any good or which flopped) is right up my alley, as you can imagine! Surprisingly enough, I haven't subjected myself to all of these. I saw "Gatsby" eons ago and was disappointed, though RR looked nice in his duds. Sadly, no beefcake moments. It just came off sort of glacially dull from what little I can recall. "Gable and Lombard" was just wrong-headed. Jill is good, but not as the luminous Carole! "Mame" is like a wounded flamingo. I feel guilty witnessing it suffer, but still have to observe. LOL I love the supporting cast and the costuming. I had trouble getting through "A Star is Born" and could NOT make it through the bizarre "Bluebird," even with the promise of Liz and Ava! I haven't seen "The Lucky Lady" but will likely subject myself sometime just to see Burt (and to a lesser degree Robbie) and to see him with Gene Hackman - they seem from opposite planets to me! Burt and Liza did another movie together years later. It went nowhere, too. Lastly, I just LOVE any issue of Rona Barrett's Hollywood. It was by far the best of all that era's gossip rags. She knew a lot about the people of Tinseltown, seemed to have a finger on the pulse, and managed to get so many great pictures into her publications.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Poseidon, I would have added 'Lost Horizon' to the line-up, but that was just a bit before my movie-going experience. I did watch and review that campfest many years later. As for Rona, she was the first showbiz writer to give equal weight to the biz side of show. Ahead of her time in that sense. Cheers, Rick

      Delete